Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

249 Wis. 618

26 N.W.2d 249

Dane County v. Barron County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1947

Wisconsin Supreme Court · decided 1947-01-13

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1974

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1947-01-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 The following memorandum was filed May 13, 1947 :

Rosenberry, C. J.

¶2 (on motion for rehearing). In the opinion in this case the following paragraph appears: (p. 628.)

“It is considered the department correctly held that Connery was at all times during 1932 and 1933 a pauper; that he received assistance as a pauper (or dependent poor person) and that he never acquired a residence in Dane county.”

¶3 On motion for rehearing, our attention is called to the fact that this is not a correct statement. That is true and the paragraph is stricken from the opinion and the following is substituted therefor:

“It is considered the department correctly held that Connery received assistance as a pauper (or dependent poor person) and that he never acquired a residence in Dane county during 1932 and 1933.”

¶4 By the Court. — Motion for rehearing denied with $25 costs.

/249/wis/618 · .json · Public domain