Brown v. Levy’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003 · 212 Pa. Super. 83 - Smith v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance · Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks County · 395 Pa. Super. 439 - Gotwalt v. Dellinger · Thompson v. Cortese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Does an inmate’s mandamus action that seeks (i) an order compelling a protho-notary to accept a previously rejected civil complaint for filing, and (ii) an award of money damages for alleged physical and mental suffering supposedly caused by the prothonotary’s actions, address “the effects of actions by a government party on the life of an inmate confined in prison” so as to constitute “prison conditions litigation” as that term is defined in § 6601 of the Pennsylvania Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6601, et seq. (“PLRA”), thereby subjecting the action to dismissal pursuant to the “three strikes” rule of 42 Pa.C.S. § 6602(f)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Levy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.