Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Ala. App. 127 - Daly v. Johnson

25 Ala. App. 127 - Daly v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1932
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Birmingham Electric Co. v. Harry · State v. Peoples · Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To amend section one of an act entitled, an act to make better provisions for paying witnesses who appear for and at the instance of the State in the trial and investigation of criminal cases and charges in the circuit court of Walker county, or the Walker county law and equity court or before the judges or grand juries of either of said courts, approved November 23, 1907. Be it enacted by the Legislature of Alabama, That section one of an act entitled, an act to make better provision for paying witnesses who appear for and at the instance of the State in the trial and investigation of criminal cases an charges in the circuit court of Walker county, or the Walker county law and equity court or before the judges or grand juries of either of said courts, approved November 23, 1907, be amended,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To better provide for the payment of witnesses in criminal cases who are summoned and appear for the State in the several courts of Walker county.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “C. R. Bricken, Presiding Judge of the Court of Appeals of Alabama. Wm. H. Samford, Associate Judge, etc. James Rice, Associate Judge, etc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.