25 Ala. App. 334 - Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1992
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Riddle v. State · 21 Ala. App. 173 - Mathews v. State · 21 Ala. App. 173 - Stewart v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A state's witness was allowed to testify, over due objection, etc., that, as they were taking appellant to jail, he asked the officers 'if he could take a sentence and go on and put up his time, or would he have to stay in jail and put up bond.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"The admission of the testimony last referred to — the question to the officers — was, of course, error. Mathews v. State , 21 Ala. App. 173 , 106 So. 206 [(1925)]."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Hush crying there is no use crying, they have caught us and there is no use to cry, just a year and a day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.