Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Ala. App. 593 - Eastep v. State

25 Ala. App. 593 - Eastep v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably 32 Ala. App. 309 - Troup v. State (1946), 47 Ala. App. 136 - Baldwin v. State (1971)

28 state decisions

10019331940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. McDaniels · Hall v. State · Gordon v. State · Roberts v. State · Parsons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`It is an established maxim of the common law, in the administration of criminal justice, constantly recognized by elementary writers, and courts of judicature from a very early period down to the present time, that a man shall not be brought into danger of his life or limb for one and the same offense, more than once.... The right not to be put in jeopardy a second time for the same cause is as important as the right of trial by jury, and is guarded with as much care. Accordingly there will be found in the Constitution of the United States and in the constitutions of most of the States (See Const. Ala.1901, § 9) a provision that no person shall for the same offense be twice put in jeopardy, which, however, is but a recognition of the humane rule of the common law, and a plea of former conviction (or acquittal) is good under either the constitution or the common law.' 8 R.C.L. pp. 134 and 135, §§ 114 and 115."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.