25 Ariz. App. 234 - State v. Turrubiates’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably State v. Mosley (1978), Dorman v. State (1981)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Romano v. United States · State v. Bearden · State v. Harvill · United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Thompson v. Charles L. Dye, Warden, Allegheny County Jail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There was no requirement that the corpus delicti be established beyond a reasonable doubt prior to the introduction of appellant’s confession which might serve the dual purpose of connecting him with the crime and proving the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt.” 542 P.2d at 431 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If exculpating evidence comes to their [the police] attention during the investigation, Brady requires the prosecutor to furnish defense counsel with its substance. Beyond this, Brady does not go.” 25 Ariz.App. at 240 , 542 P.2d at 433 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lajeunesse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.