Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Ark. App. 335 - Blakemore v. State

25 Ark. App. 335 - Blakemore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2016

17 state decisions

801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baxter v. State · 11 Ark. App. 129 - Jones v. State · Azbill v. State · Dowell v. State · Roberts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A law enforcement officer lawfully present in any place may, in the performance of his duties, stop and detain any person who he reasonably suspects is committing, has |7committed, or is about to commit (1) a felony, or (2) a misdemean- or involving danger of forcible injury to persons or of appropriation of or damage to property, if such action is reasonably necessary either to obtain or verify the identification of the person or to determine the lawfulness of his conduct. An officer acting under this rule may require the person to remain in or near such place in the officer’s presence for a period of not more than fifteen (15) minutes or for such time as is reasonable under the circumstances. At the end of such period the person detained shall be released without further restraint, or arrested and charged with an offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.