Cuneo v. Smith (In Re Smith)’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2014
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Carini v. Matera · In the Matter of Grant L. Nelson, Bankrupt. California State Employees' Credit Union No. 6, a California Corporation v. Grant L. Nelson · Maas Bros., Inc. v. Ratajczak (In Re Ratajczak) · United Retailers of Easton, Inc. v. Falk of Bethlehem (In Re Falk of Bethlehem)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt— [[Image here]] (2) for obtaining money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinance of credit, by— (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.