Roche v. Roche’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably 11 Cal. 3d 679 - In Re BG (1974), 38 Cal. 2d 676 - Lerner v. Superior Court (1952)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Stever v. Stever · Campbell v. Wright · In re White · 55 Cal. App. 114 - Newby v. Newby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is of no significance that the court awarded the bare legal ‘control’ of the child to both parents. The essential thing in which a parent is interested is the physical control and care of the child, which here was awarded to the paternal grandparents. The policy above declared may not be thwarted by the artifice of giving a fit parent bare legal control while denying actual physical care and custody.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“by what appears to be the best interest of the child in respect to its temporal and mental and moral welfare.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the case of Stever v. Stever, 6 Cal.2d 166 [ 56 P.2d 1229 ], this court held that section 197 of the Civil Code should be construed with subdivision 1 of section 246 of said code (now section 1406 of the Probate Code) and they contemplate that the natural right of a parent to the care of a minor child, if a fit and proper person, shall prevail as against an entire stranger, the law presuming, in the absence of other evidence or findings showing the contrary, that either parent is a proper person to whom the minor's care should be awarded. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Navarro v. Hull
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.