People v. Nagle’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
174 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 178 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably 53 Cal. 2d 407 - People v. Ingle (1960), 59 Cal. 2d 503 - People v. Ketchel (1963)
174 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 885 - People v. Putnam · 24 Cal. 2d 870 - People v. Gonzales · 8 Cal. App. 420 - Ex Parte Heacock · In re McCarty · Roesel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such a state of facts as would lead a man of ordinary caution or prudence to believe, and conscientiously entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.