¶1We are satisfied that the point made in this ease in support of the appeal is not well taken,—namely, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment. From a reading and consideration of the evidence we are satisfied that the contrary is the case. The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
25 Cal. App. 729
145 P 151
People v. Zerman
Decided November 11, 1914
California Court of Appeal · decided 1914-11-11
<p>APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1914-11-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 1967
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →