Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

25 Cal. App. 2d 466

Isett v. Frees

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1938

California Court of Appeal · decided 1938-03-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1957

3 state decisions

Relies on In re Wignall · In re Yahne

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1938-03-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT.

¶1Upon submission of the motion to dismiss, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

¶2This matter comes before the court on a motion to dismiss. The appellant has not appeared in the case; that is, there has been no transcript or brief filed within the time provided by law. The motion is good and it is granted. (In re Yahne, 193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452]; In re Wignall, 193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)

/25/calapp2d/466 · .json · Public domain