Schultz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 7 U.S.C. § 1308 · 7 U.S.C. § 1385 · 7 U.S.C. § 1421 (Agricultural Act of 1949) · 7 U.S.C. § 1429 · 7 U.S.C. § 1445B
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · New York v. Ferber · American Hospital Ass'n v. Bowen · Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United States · Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny change in farming operations that would otherwise serve to increase the number of persons for application of the payment limitation must be bona fide and substantive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.