Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 COLO 308 - Rhode v. Steinmetz

Rhode v. Steinmetz’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
8
states following
October 1970
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1970

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

60189819001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer · People Ex Rel. Dailey v. . Livingston · Kingery v. Berry · Coglan v. Beard · Beulah Marble Co. v. Mattice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The court, upon recount, must be sure that it has before it the identical and unaltered ballots which were deposited by the voters, before they become controlling, as against the certificate of the result of the canvass of the election officers. Kingery v. Berry, 94 Ill. 515 . * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.