Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Conn. Super. Ct. 1 - Stevenson v. Edwards

25 Conn. Super. Ct. 1 - Stevenson v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bulkley v. Norwich & Westerly Railway Co. · Crocker v. City of Hartford · Forbes v. Town of Suffield · Hendsey v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to maintain this type of action is granted by statute only, and that right, thus created, is limited by the express terms and conditions of the statute itself and cannot be extended by this court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.