25 Conn. Super. Ct. 409 - Duperry v. Administrator’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Detroit Gravure Corp. v. Employment Security Commission · Cassar v. Employment Security Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Wilfulness or misconduct contemplated by the act is generally held to mean something more than mere negligence or carelessness, so that for this court to overrule the commissioner the conduct of the employee must manifest an intentional, substantial disregard of the employer's interest and an intentional disregard of the duties, obligations and responsibilities that [the employee] owed to [the employer]. . . . Wilful implies bad purpose, wantonness and reckless indifference. . . . Inefficiency, negligence, carelessness, improper conduct and errors in judgment alone are not construed to be wilful misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.