Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 F.1d 447 - Continental Ins. v. The Frederick E. Ives

Continental Ins. v. The Frederick E. Ives’s Empirical Analysis

25 F. 447 · 1885

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
May 1930
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1930

1 federal appellate · 7 district ·

30188518901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Marianna Flora · Philadelphia & R. R. v. The Allie & Evie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"This involved the exercise of judgment as to what ought to be done under the circumstances. A mere mistake is not enough to charge the tugs with any loss whicli followed. To make them liable, the error must be one which a careful and prudent navigator, surrounded by like circumstances, would not have made. * * I cannot: believe ¡hat ordinary prudence required an abandonment of the voyage, for the time being, by lying up or seeking a harbor. The ing was commanded by a competent master, and the captain of the barge was an experienced boatman. No objection 'was made by any one to going on, and it is evident that no person connected with the tow considered it necessary to stop.” See. also, The Clematis, Brown, Adm. 499, 502, Fed. Cas. No. 2,876; The Allie, 24 Fed. 745 , 749. and cases there cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.