Weil v. Calhoun’s Empirical Analysis
25 F. 865 · 1885
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1972
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Welton v. The State of Missouri · Beer Company v. Massachusetts · Stone v. Mississippi · Ward v. Maryland · Miles v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is possible, as I think, to separate this obnoxious clause—protecting domestic wines from the operation of the act—from the rest of it; declare it void, and let the broad prohibition clause have its full effect. I am not, however, as clear on this branch of the subject as I would like to be.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Kinnebrew
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.