Mizell v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.2d 324 · 1928
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1992
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 221 (§ 1 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913) · 28 U.S.C. § 121
Relies on James Tinsley v. Morgan Treat · John Benson v. William Henkel · Ruthenberg v. United States · Benjamin Greene v. William Henkel · Spencer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.