Maury v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.2d 412 · 1928
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1973
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Watson v. Jones · Holland v. Challen · Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. · Lawson v. United States Mining Co. · Dick v. Foraker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is fair to infer from the intimate knowledge defendants [including Maury] had of the controversy from the *Page 510 beginning, if not from the small sum bid — scarcely 50 cents an acre — that they understood they were buying but a chance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.