Piroglu v. Tr Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 1098 · 1994
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably 14 Cal. 4th 846 - Loder v. City of Glendale (1997), Herzog v. Village of Winnetka (2002)
9 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Perry v. Sindermann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a probationary employee may be terminated before completing his probationary period if he 'fails to demonstrate that he ... possesses the skill and character traits necessary for satisfactory performance.’” 25 F.3d 1098, 1104 (D.C.Cir.1994) (quoting District Personnel Manual, Ch. 8, Subpart 6.3(H)(1)). The Circuit rejected the argument”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he regulation ... sets out certain circumstances in which a probationary employee may be terminated,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.