Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 F.3d 1389 - United States v. Maxwell

United States v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis

25 F.3d 1389 · 1994

Citation profile

137
cited by 137 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

105 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 137 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Arrington (1996)

105 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

1090199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney · United States v. Dunnigan · Cities of Charlottesville v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. · Brewster v. Derwinski · California v. ARC America Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Wjhile [the] racially disparate impact [of the ratio] may be a serious matter, it is not a matter for the courts, and, therefore, not a basis upon which a court may rely to impose a sentence outside of the applicable Guidelines range.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a full and complete statement as to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or why they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.