Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 F.3d 1401 - United States v. Atkins

United States v. Atkins’s Empirical Analysis

25 F.3d 1401 · 1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2014

17 federal appellate ·

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 286 · 18 U.S.C. § 287

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Grogan v. Garner · In re Disbarment of Alexander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have consistently allowed the government to use employment status as a valid, race-neutral proxy for juror selection, so long as the government exercises its challenges in a consistent manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.