United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 1452 · 1994
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably United States v. Broughton-Jones (1995), United States v. Blake (1996)
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc. · Belisle v. Anzivino · McFadden v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“losses caused by the specific conduct underlying the offense of conviction....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[R]estitution determinations under the VWPA are quite different from sentencing determinations under the Sentencing Guidelines.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he government is to be held to the literal terms of the agreement....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.