Kelly v. Withrow’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 363 · 1994
Citation profile
36 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1996), Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp. (1999)
36 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Thomas v. Arn · Irvin v. Dowd · Hernandez v. New York · Sheppard v. Maxwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The requirement for specific objections to a magistrate judge's report is not jurisdictional and a failure to comply may be excused in the interest of justice”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the objections directed the district judge's attention to specific issues decided by the magistrate contrary to Kelly's position,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“has failed to demonstrate any actual prejudice flowing from [the] publicity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.