Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 F.3d 52 - United States v. Boot

United States v. Boot’s Empirical Analysis

25 F.3d 52 · 1994

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2001
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Chapman v. United States · United States v. McFadden · United States v. Tucker · United States v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not override the applicability of 'mixture or substance' for the purpose of applying any mandatory minimum sentence”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for purposes of determining the base offense level”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because the weights of LSD carrier media vary widely and typically far exceed the weight of the controlled substance itself, the Commission has determined that basing offense levels on the entire weight of the LSD and carrier medium would produce unwarranted disparity among offenses involving the same quantity of actual LSD (but different carrier weights), as well as sentences disproportionate to those for other, more dangerous controlled substances, such as PCP. Consequently, in cases involving LSD contained in a carrier medium, the Commission has established a weight per dose of 0.4 milligram for purposes of determining the base offense level. The dosage weight of LSD exceeds the Drug Enforcement Administration's standard dosage unit for LSD of 0.05 milligram (i.e., the quantity of actual LSD per dose) in order to assign some weight to the carrier medium. Because LSD typically is marketed and consumed orally on a carrier medium, the inclusion of some weight attributable to the carrier medium recognizes (A) that offense levels for most other controlled substances are based upon the weight of the mixture containing the controlled substance without regard to purity, and (B) the decision in Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453 , 111 S.Ct. 1919 , 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (1991) (holding that the term “mixture or substance” in 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1) includes the carrier medium in which LSD is absorbed). At the same time, the weight per dose selected is less than the weight per dose that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.