United States v. Post’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 599 · 1994
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 2015
most recently cited
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Ayrs v. Yanik · United States v. Brelsford · United States v. Polland · 837 F. Supp. 916 - United States v. Franklin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense, [the Guidelines mandate an increase of] 2 levels.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review findings of fact for clear error and give due deference to the district court's application of the Guidelines to the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.