Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 F.3d 647 - Hummel-Jones v. Strope

Hummel-Jones v. Strope’s Empirical Analysis

25 F.3d 647 · 1994

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
4
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Hart v. O'Brien (1997), Walden v. Carmack (1998)

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

2001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Malley v. Briggs · Tennessee v. Garner · Brown v. Texas · Ybarra v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he manner in which a warrant is executed is always subject to judicial review to ensure that it does not traverse the general Fourth Amendment proscription against unreasonableness.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.