Payton v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 684 · 1994
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2012
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · Thomas v. Sullivan · Thorne v. Califano · Harris v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services · Driggins v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After careful consideration of the entire record, the undersigned finds that the claimant has the residual functional capacity to perform a full range of work at all exertional levels but with the following nonexertional limitations: she is limited to simple, routine, repetitive work with only superficial contact with the public, at no more than a regular pace.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence is sufficiently clear to make a fair determination as to whether or not the claimant is disabled.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tate v. Apfel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.