Jackson v. Axton’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 884 · 1994
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Jacobsen v. Deseret Book Co. (2002), Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc. (2006)
39 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 507 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Fogerty Fantasy Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]his court has reviewed a grant of summary judgment on grounds of laches both de novo and for abuse of discretion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“equitable discretion ... 'in light of the considerations [the Court has previously] identified.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arranged his business affairs around the Song”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.