McBride v. Sharpe’s Empirical Analysis
25 F.3d 962 · 1994
Citation profile
25 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Cook (1995), Mapes v. Coyle (1999)
25 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 46
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Estelle v. McGuire · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Kuhlmann v. Wilson · Lane v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find Rule 56(c) notice inconsistent with a Habeas Rule 8(a) disposition when the parties do not raise issues requiring a factual inquiry outside the record and the district court does not rely on material outside the record in disposing of the petition. Thus, we hold that the ten-day notice requirement of Rule 56(c) does not apply to such a disposition pursuant to Habeas Rule [12].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a federal habeas case, a written finding made by a state court of competent jurisdiction after a hearing on the merits of a factual issue in a proceeding to which the petitioner and the state were parties shall be presumed to be correct unless a statutory exception applies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kight v. Singletary“[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state court determinations on state law questions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hunt v. Tucker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.