Johnstone v. Cronlund’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2024
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 26 F. Supp. 566 - Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. · Demmert v. Demmert · People of California v. The Steamship Jules Fribourg · Knowlton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. · United States v. Cincotta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A request for an admission, except in a most unusual circumstance, should be such that it could be answered yes, no, the answerer does not know, or a very simple direct explanation given as to why he cannot answer, such as in the case of privilege.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 36 should not be used unless the statement of fact sought to be admitted is phrased so that it can be admitted or denied without explanation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.