25 F. Supp. 662 - The Sydfold’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 1992
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 4 · 9 U.S.C. § 8
Relies on Shanferoke Coal Supply Corporation v. Westchester Service Corporation · Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American Line · Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co. · Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc. · Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . Goldston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the basis of jurisdiction be a cause of action otherwise justiciable in admiralty, then, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the party claiming to be aggrieved m'ay begin his proceeding hereunder by libel and seizure of the vessel or •other property of the other party according to the usual course of admiralty proceedings, and the court shall then have jurisdiction to direct the parties to proceed with the arbitration and shall retain jurisdiction to enter its decree upon the award.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.