Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
19 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2016
19 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 132 · 35 U.S.C. § 251
Relies on MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross · Multiform Desiccants, Inc. v. Medzam, Ltd. · Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. · Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Identix, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“could have been done in two days all leads to the conclusion that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.