CARDIEL’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1426 · 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · McClain v. State · Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. · United States v. Corona-Sanchez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.