Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 I&NDEC 285 - QUILANTAN

QUILANTAN’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · United States v. Menasche · Leocal v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an alien who physically presents herself for questioning and makes no knowing false claim to citizenship is ‘inspected,’ even though she volunteers no information and is asked no questions by the immigration authorities, and that such an alien has satisfied the ‘inspected and admitted' requirement of [ 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a)].” Quilantan, 25 I. & N. Dec. at 293 ; see also Cordova-Soto v. Holder, 659 F.3d 1029, 1034 (10th Cir. 2011) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The terms "admission" and "admitted" mean, with respect to an alien, the lawful entry of the alien into the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “An alien who enters the United States under a false claim of United States citizenship has not been inspected ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.