U. SINGH’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on James v. United States · Leocal v. Ashcroft · Sykes v. United States · Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales · Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.