Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 KAN 308 - In re Bort

In re Bort’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Yarborough v. Yarborough (1933), Ross v. Hoffman (1977)

2 district · 55 state decisions — followed in 24 states

100188118901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not, however, propose to place our disposition of this case upon the decision of any such question as that. We shall concede, that as between the parents, that decision is a finality, and still we do not feel warranted in sustaining the petition of the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We understand the law to be, when the custody of children is the question, that the best interest of the children is the paramount fact. Rights of father and mother sink into insignificance before that. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may interfere at any time and in any way to protect and advance [the child's] welfare and interests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.