Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 KAN 71 - Underhill v. Spencer

Underhill v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2007

14 state decisions

401881189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garrett v. Logan · Miller v. Garrett · Brown v. Jones · Steele v. Thatcher · McRae v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . But the damages which flow from an injunction order are sustained after the suit is commenced and order made. They are not strictly assessable in that action, but only in a subsequent suit. And that suit is simply on the bond for damages. It is an independent action, but an outgrowth of and founded upon the injunction action. . . .” (l. c. 73.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . In this case the amount was agreed upon and the sum was reasonable. The defendant’s liability was absolute, but the fees had not in fact been paid. With perhaps the single exception of California, the authorities agree that if the liability is fixed and absolute, it is enough; payment is not an essential prerequisite. . . .” (p. 73.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.