25 Kan. App. 2d 1 - State v. Soler’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jurdan · 20 Kan. App. 2d 932 - State v. Richardson · 51 Wash. App. 274 - State v. Tunell · 21 Kan. App. 2d 597 - State v. Zuck · 22 Kan. App. 2d 837 - State v. Hawes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A district court is free to consider the real facts in determining whether to depart even if those facts would also support elements of an uncharged or dismissed offense; however, the district court cannot use real facts that establish elements of a greater degree of the same crime that was the subject of a plea agreement. A contrary result would be tantamount to indirectly ratcheting up the crime of conviction-a result clearly not intended by the legislature and inconsistent with public policy.” 25 Kan. App. 2d at 7.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.