25 Md. App.
Volume 25 — Maryland Appellate Reports
57 opinions
- 25 Md. App. 1Maizel v. Maizel & Shapiro Enterprises, Inc. (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 8Maryland Mortgage & Investment Co. v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 16Gnau v. Seidel (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 26In Re Appeal No. 544, Term 1974 (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 43Boyce v. Sembly (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 68Davis v. Frederick County Board of Commissioners (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 85Saunders v. Stradley (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 99Staley v. Staley (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 115Griffin v. Anne Arundel County (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 139Clark v. Seidel (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 148Lightfoot v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 162Ponds v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 178Ming Kuei Liu v. Dunnigan (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 194Brooks v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 201Giardina v. Farms Co. (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 218In Re Appeal No. 568, Term 1974 (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 225Kight v. Bowman (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 233Beverungen v. Briele (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 243Roggenkamp v. Roggenkamp (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 253Cunningham v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 263Pyles v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 270Renshaw v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 276Liller v. State Highway Administration (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 284Herd v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 291Mollar v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 303Security Construction Co. v. Maietta (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 309Sutton v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 322Moon v. Weeks (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 338Williamson v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 350Halle v. Halle (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 356Slusher v. Hanson Road Joint Venture (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 361Hensley v. Montgomery County (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 375Erbe v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 391Borza v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 417Crowley v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 428Whitman v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 458Everdell v. Carroll (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 478Hebb v. Stump, Harvey & Cook, Inc. (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 493Kowalski v. Lámar (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 503Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Hicks (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 537Lawson v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 551Jenkins v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 558Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. Bowles (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 558UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD. v. Bowles (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 565In Re Appeal No. 769, Term 1974 (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 586Link v. Hutzler Bros. (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 598Morgan v. Metropolitan Fuels, Inc. (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 605Maryland Coal & Realty Co. v. Eckhart (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 628Sturgis v. State (1975)
CRIMINAL LAW — <italic>Plea Negotiations — Breach Of Agreement By</italic><italic>State — Judgment Vacated — Remanded For Further Proceedings —</italic><italic>When A Plea Rests In Any Significant Degree On A Promise Or</italic><italic>Agreement Of Prosecutor So That It Is Part Of Inducement Or</italic><italic>Consideration, Such Promise Must Be Fulfilled; And Interests Of</italic><italic>Justice And Appropriate Recognition Of Duties Of Prosecution Will</italic><italic>Be Best Served By Remanding Case For Further Proceedings — Where</italic><italic>Prosecutor Violates Agreement To Make No Recommendation As To</italic><italic>Sentencing, Accused May At His Option Have Plea Bargain Vacated</italic><italic>Or Elect To Be Resentenced By A Different Judge — Upon Rescission</italic><italic>Of Plea Bargaining Accused Will Have To Plead Anew To All Of</italic><italic>Original Charges, Including Those Nol Prossed — If Prior To</italic><italic>Consummation Of A Plea Bargain Prosecutor Foresees That It Might</italic><italic>Endanger Society, He Has Not Merely Right, But Responsibility, To</italic><italic>Withdraw From Agreement — Upon Record Here, It Is Patent State</italic><italic>Agreed To Abstain From Recommending Sentence In Exchange For A</italic><italic>Negotiated Plea Of Not Guilty And Trial Upon A Factual</italic><italic>Stipulation And Was Breached When State's Attorney Appeared In</italic><italic>Court At Sentencing And Unilaterally Abrogated Assistant State's</italic><italic>Attorney's Agreement With Accused, Rendering Valueless State's</italic><italic>Word And Effectively Eroded Trust In State's Integrity — Better</italic><italic>Practice Is That Record Affirmatively Show Existence Of A Plea</italic><italic>Bargain And Its Term</italic>. pp. 633-637 J.A.R.
- 25 Md. App. 638Gardner v. Gardner (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 647Oliver v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 656Womble v. Miller (1975)
DISCOVERY — DEPOSITIONS — <italic>Notice To Take Deposition — Refusal</italic><italic>To Be Deposed — Sanctions — Judicial Discretion — Defendant's</italic><italic>Notice To Take A Deposition For Discovery In Plaintiff's Suit For</italic><italic>False Arrest And Malicious Prosecution Met Requirements Of</italic><italic>Maryland Rule 405 As To Time And Content Of Notice In All</italic><italic>Respects — Where A Deposition Is Being Taken For Purpose Of</italic><italic>Oppression Or Abuse, Court May, On Proper Application, Pass A</italic><italic>Protective Order — Maryland Rule 406 — In Situation Here, Where</italic><italic>Plaintiff Appeared And Refused To Be Deposed His Declination</italic><italic>Constituted A Violation; And Trial Judge Did Not Abuse His</italic><italic>Discretion In Ordering Plaintiff To Pay Reasonable Expenses And</italic><italic>Defendant's Counsel Fees Incurred In Deposition — Maryland Rule</italic><italic>422</italic>. pp. 665-668 J.A.R.
- 25 Md. App. 669Saulsbury v. Denton National Bank (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 679Green v. State (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 706Wallick v. Wallick (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 709Fitzgerald v. Montgomery County Board of Education (1975)
- 25 Md. App. 717Carter v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. (1975)