Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Md. App. 263 - Pyles v. State

25 Md. App. 263 - Pyles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Robinson v. State of California · Leland v. Oregon · McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution · Murel v. Baltimore City Criminal Court · United States v. Albright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not interpret this language [from McNeil] as laying down a rule of law that the record must affirmatively show that the appellant’s conduct was not the product of mental or emotional instability, but rather as indicating a possible defense to a charge of contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.