Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Md. App. 679 - Green v. State

25 Md. App. 679 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2006

24 state decisions

1001975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Dunn v. United States · Garrison v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the tape that was obtained by wire tapping was not made in the presence of the Inspector and he did not claim to recognize any of the voices heard therefrom, his answer to the question, if permitted to be given, would obviously have been hearsay. And, as no effort was made to produce the original tape, nor any explanation offered for its non-production-, the answer called for, if allowed, would have violated the best evidence rule. The best evidence of which the case is capable must be produced, and secondary, or inferior, evidence is only admissible after a, proper foundation has been laid, showing good and sufficient reasons for the failure to produce the primary evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]hree factors must coalesce to effect the Brady sanction: `(a) suppression by the prosecution after a request by the defense, (b) the evidence's favorable character for the defense, and (c) the materiality of the evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “do[es] not provide a constitutional device permitting [a defendant] to cast his net upon the evidentiary waters, nor do[es it] extend our rules of discovery to such broad, net-like fishing expeditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.