Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

25 N.C. 155

Skinner v. . Lamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1842

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1842-12-05

An appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Pasquotank County, at Fall Term, 1842, his Honor Judge Bailey presiding. The action was detinue, brought to recover cert.-in slaves-mentioned in the declaration. On the trial, the will of William W. Freshwater was offered in evidence, (of which the parts material to this case are quoted in the opinion delivered in this court.) It was admitted that the executor qualified to the will, and assented to the legacies contained in it.

Cited in Bouvier (1914)’s definition of “Balance”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1842-12-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1979

5 state decisions

3018421850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Daniel, J.

¶1 William W. Freshwater made his will, and, after some devises of land and personal property, and directing his debts to be paid, bequeathed as follows : “ The balance of my estate to be equally divided between my wife and children.” The testator at his death had three children, daughters, Matilda, Orange and Elizabeth. In another clause of the will the testator said, “ my wish ánd desire is, should either of my children die,' without leaving an heir begotten by their body or bodies, that the survivor or survi *157 vors have the whole. And should my children all die without leaving an heir begotten by their bodies, my wish desire is, that my brother Thaddeus Freshwater should heir the whole of my estate as allotted to my children.” Matilda married and then died, leaving an only child, which is still alive. Elizabeth married Henry W..Skinner, and they aie the plaintiffs. Orange died without issue, and .after the death of her sister Matilda. The executor of William W. Freshwater had assented to the legacies. The defendant has possession of the slaves, which were allotted to Orange in the division of the property under her father’s will; he refused to surrender them to the plaintiffs, and they have bro’t this action of detinue to recover them. The judge was of opinion, that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover these slaves. And we are of the same opinion, upon the authorities of Gregory v Beasley, 1 Ired. Eq. Rep. 25, and Threadgill v Ingram, 1 Ired. Rep. 577. Ferguson v Dunbar, 3 Bro. C. C. 469, in note (Belt’s ed.) 2 Roper on Legacies, 322. On the death of Matilda, leaving a child, the hopes and interest of the testator’s brother, Thaddeus, (the ulterior legatee,) were extinguished; because he could never take, unless all the daughters died without leaving issue. The three original legacies were vested, on the death the testator, subject each to be divested, and go over to the survivor or survivors, on the death of either legatee without issue. In this case, Elizabeth is the only survivor, and must take the entire legacy, that had been assigned to Orange, who died without issue. The court regrets that the child of Matilda is excluded, but we can only construe wills, and are not authorized to alter or make them.

¶2 Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

/25/nc/155 · .json · Public domain