25 N.C. App. 721 - Durham v. Creech’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 24 N.C. App. 255 - Arnold v. Howard · 25 N.C. App. 18 - NYTCO LEASING, INC. v. Dan-Cleve Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court is granted the discretionary power to enter a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties, ‘only if there is no just reason for delay and it is so determined in the judgment.' [Emphasis in the original.] By making the express determination in the judgment that there is ‘no just reason for delay,' the trial judgment in effect certifies that the judgment is a final judgment and subject to immediate appeal. In the absence of such an express determination in the judgment, Rule 51(b) makes ‘any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties,’ interlocutory and not final. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pitt v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.