Tiplick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · United States v. Harriss · Grayned v. City of Rockford · City of Chicago v. Morales · Brady v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“synthetic substance” instead of "synthetic drug” causes "linguistic confusion” that "adds to the vagueness of this statutory structure.” Op. at 187. The emergency rule adds thirteen "synthetics,” including XLR-11, according to "IC 25-26-13-4.1.” Appellant’s App. p. 63. Section 25-26-13-4.1, in turn, ' allows the Board of Pharmacy to adopt an emergency rule to declare that a substance is a "synthetic drug.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ashfaque v. State“drug” as part of Public Law 78-2012. The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ashfaque v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.