State v. Wallen’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2004
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * [W]e find no reason to even consider them [allegations of error] on their merits because appellant failed to raise them at his trial and in the Conrt of Appeals below. “It is the policy of this court, from which we are presently disinclined to deviate, to refuse to consider such questions. State v. Jones (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 13 , 211 N. E. 2d 198 . To entertain such questions now would effectively permit appellant to bypass consideration of those questions by the trial court, or the Court of Appeals.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.