Peyko v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 110 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center (1994), Bell v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center (1993)
2 federal appellate · 110 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 152 Ohio St. 185 - Hart v. Republic Mutual Ins. · Waldmann v. Waldmann · 141 Ohio St. 87 - In Re Martin, Jr. · Centennial Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · 132 Ohio St. 187 - In Re Klemann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at a hearing held subsequent to the verdict or decision in the action that the party required to pay the money failed to make a good faith effort to settle the case and that the party to whom the money is to be paid did not fail to make a good faith effort to settle the case.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he purpose of R.C. 1343.03 (C) is to encourage litigants to make a good faith effort to settle their case, thereby conserving legal resources and promoting judicial economy.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage““1. When a plaintiff, having obtained a judgment against a defendant, files a motion for prejudgment interest on the amount of that judgment pursuant to R.C. 1343.03(C), the plaintiff, upon a showing of ‘good cause’ pursuant to Civ.R. 26(B)(3), may have access through discovery to those portions of the defendant’s insurer’s ‘claims file’ that are not shown by the defense to be privileged attorney-client communications. “2. If the defense asserts the attorney-client privilege with regard to the contents of the ‘claims file,’ the trial court shall determine by in camera inspection which portions of the file, if any, are so privileged. The plaintiff then shall be granted access to the non-privileged portions of the file.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.