In Re Weisbard’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2024
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on First National Bank of Telluride v. Fleisher · Tyler v. Adams County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. Tyler · Sumler v. District Court, City & County of Denver · Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Hines Highlands Ltd. Partnership · Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment v. Caulk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party's conduct constitutes excusable neglect when the surrounding cireumstances would cause a reasonably careful person similarly to neglect a duty. Common carelessness and negligence do not amount to exeusable neglect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unforeseen cireum-stances which would cause a reasonably prudent person to overlook a required act in the performance of some responsibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[mlistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.