State v. Trickler’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2021
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Brown · 126 Wash. 2d 244 - State v. Powell · 96 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Tharp · 98 Wash. 2d 358 - State v. Saltarelli · State v. Bourgeois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile the events leading up to the discovery of the stolen credit card were relevant and somewhat probative, it was not shown that Mr. Trickler’s possession of other allegedly stolen items was an inseparable part of his possession of the stolen credit card, which is the test commonly used in this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Briejer“any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.